Looking over the previous Statfor post I think including the entire article may have been an error. So, in lieu of that, you’ll find links for the next two in the series below. Each takes a look at one of the presidential candidates and analyzes how their party’s historical beliefs might impact their individual approach and decision-making process in regard to foreign policy. They’re both fairly long articles, but definitely worth the read.
Although Friday’s debate is now in question, keep in mind that if it does happen the candidates will be answering questions about this very topic. Having an idea where they’re coming from, how their answers line up or diverge from historical data, and whether or not they’re consistent with their answers is a good thing. Enjoy…